<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: C# vs Java Part 3: The Frameworks (IO, DB, Concurrency, Collections)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://simpleprogrammer.com/2010/02/09/c-vs-java-part-3-the-frameworks-io-db-concurrency-collections/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://simpleprogrammer.com/2010/02/09/c-vs-java-part-3-the-frameworks-io-db-concurrency-collections/</link>
	<description>Software Development from John Sonmez&#039;s Perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:47:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jsonmez</title>
		<link>http://simpleprogrammer.com/2010/02/09/c-vs-java-part-3-the-frameworks-io-db-concurrency-collections/#comment-725</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jsonmez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 01:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simpleprogrammer.com/?p=353#comment-725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You are correct.  I haven&#039;t really gotten a chance to use PLINQ or reactive extensions myself yet, but I certainly will say something about when I do.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are correct.  I haven&#8217;t really gotten a chance to use PLINQ or reactive extensions myself yet, but I certainly will say something about when I do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hendry</title>
		<link>http://simpleprogrammer.com/2010/02/09/c-vs-java-part-3-the-frameworks-io-db-concurrency-collections/#comment-723</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hendry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 07:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simpleprogrammer.com/?p=353#comment-723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the state of the world in IO/concurrency/collection has shifted since .net 4 with Parallel extension, PLINQ, reactive-extension, and all that. Care to expand on this topic?
I&#039;m working on java myself, and I&#039;ve been following those new stuff came abroad to .net ship which looks extremely fabulous, but haven&#039;t had a chance to use it in any real work, let alone understanding how it now compares to java.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the state of the world in IO/concurrency/collection has shifted since .net 4 with Parallel extension, PLINQ, reactive-extension, and all that. Care to expand on this topic?<br />
I&#8217;m working on java myself, and I&#8217;ve been following those new stuff came abroad to .net ship which looks extremely fabulous, but haven&#8217;t had a chance to use it in any real work, let alone understanding how it now compares to java.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Faraz Lawrie</title>
		<link>http://simpleprogrammer.com/2010/02/09/c-vs-java-part-3-the-frameworks-io-db-concurrency-collections/#comment-310</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Faraz Lawrie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 04:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simpleprogrammer.com/?p=353#comment-310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fairly reasonable Google are really invested in Java skills But Dalvik is slow It wont hold against Win Phone 7 and XNA Whatever you feel about Microsoft, the .NET Framework is EXTENSIVE and really a monkey can write code with VS; it&#039;s that simple. And isn&#039;t C# ECMA standard and stuff So in theory Google could come up with their own CLI implementation or port Mono I know you can NDK for optimum performance but that is productivity lost. How good is Dalvik Turbo really??]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fairly reasonable Google are really invested in Java skills But Dalvik is slow It wont hold against Win Phone 7 and XNA Whatever you feel about Microsoft, the .NET Framework is EXTENSIVE and really a monkey can write code with VS; it&#8217;s that simple. And isn&#8217;t C# ECMA standard and stuff So in theory Google could come up with their own CLI implementation or port Mono I know you can NDK for optimum performance but that is productivity lost. How good is Dalvik Turbo really??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jsonmez</title>
		<link>http://simpleprogrammer.com/2010/02/09/c-vs-java-part-3-the-frameworks-io-db-concurrency-collections/#comment-309</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jsonmez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 03:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simpleprogrammer.com/?p=353#comment-309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was just talking about that today.  I don&#039;t know if Google will kill Dalvik because they are pretty set against Microsoft.  They really don&#039;t have C# development skills in house.  It will be interesting to see what happens though.  Things are certainly going to change.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just talking about that today.  I don&#8217;t know if Google will kill Dalvik because they are pretty set against Microsoft.  They really don&#8217;t have C# development skills in house.  It will be interesting to see what happens though.  Things are certainly going to change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Faraz Lawrie</title>
		<link>http://simpleprogrammer.com/2010/02/09/c-vs-java-part-3-the-frameworks-io-db-concurrency-collections/#comment-308</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Faraz Lawrie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 01:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simpleprogrammer.com/?p=353#comment-308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What do you think happens when they fully port Mono to Android? Since we agree that J2ME is pretty dead do you think Google will kill Dalvik IMO Mono is better but for the patents issues Do you think that will be the death knell for Java on Android( and by extension,  mobile)?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you think happens when they fully port Mono to Android? Since we agree that J2ME is pretty dead do you think Google will kill Dalvik IMO Mono is better but for the patents issues Do you think that will be the death knell for Java on Android( and by extension,  mobile)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C# vs Java Part 4: The Tools (Final) &#171; Making the Complex Simple</title>
		<link>http://simpleprogrammer.com/2010/02/09/c-vs-java-part-3-the-frameworks-io-db-concurrency-collections/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[C# vs Java Part 4: The Tools (Final) &#171; Making the Complex Simple]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 21:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simpleprogrammer.com/?p=353#comment-131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] C# vs Java Part 3: Frameworks [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] C# vs Java Part 3: Frameworks [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C# vs Java Part 3: The Frameworks (Network, Reflection, Security, Text) &#171; Making the Complex Simple</title>
		<link>http://simpleprogrammer.com/2010/02/09/c-vs-java-part-3-the-frameworks-io-db-concurrency-collections/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[C# vs Java Part 3: The Frameworks (Network, Reflection, Security, Text) &#171; Making the Complex Simple]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 19:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simpleprogrammer.com/?p=353#comment-120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] C# vs Java Part 3: Frameworks [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] C# vs Java Part 3: Frameworks [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

